webmetr vs. hotjar: site traffic counter instead of heatmaps, recordings and ux studies

this is a great seo comparison of webmetr and hotjar for site owners, webmasters, editors, bloggers, small services and teams who want to understand what tool they really need: a simple site counter or a broader analytics platform.

hotjar is historically known as a service for heatmaps, session recordings, surveys and feedback. is a tool that helps you see how users navigate the page, where they click, where they stop, and what gets in the way. this is not a classic attendance counter.

webmetr answers the question of how much and from where. hotjar answers the question of how exactly people interacted with the page.

a short conclusion

webmetr is better if you need to see site traffic daily: views, sessions, visitors, sources, countries, pages, referrers, browsers, operating systems and online.

hotjar is better if you optimize ux, order form, landing page, checkout or want to see session recordings and heatmaps.

what is webmetr in this comparison

webmetr is a hosted meter for a website. the user registers, adds a domain, receives the html code and inserts it into the pages. after that, webmetr collects hits and shows clear reports: by day, by time of day, online, by week and month, audience size, pages, directories, entry points, exit points, sources, countries, regions, browsers, operating systems and extensions.

the main idea of ​​webmetr is not to force the user to build a complex dashboard. the main idea is to provide statistics pages that work like normal old internet pages: /stat/example.com/index.html, /stat/example.com/hours.html, /stat/example.com/countries.html. if the statistics are public, the link can be sent to another person without explanation.

what is hotjar

hotjar in this comparison is behavior analytics, heatmaps and session recordings. it can be a very strong product in its category, but the category doesn't always match the simple site counter. that is why the comparison should be made not by the number of functions, but by what task the site owner solves.

hotjar/contentsquare pricing is built around products and session allowances. the official documentation describes observe, ask and engage, and pricing depends on the plan, site and available limits.

ease of start-up

for webmetr startup should be short. no need to start with a tracking plan, segments, custom events, product taxonomy, heatmap sampling or enterprise access. if the site already exists, the owner takes the code and pastes it into the html. after the first hits, the statistics start to fill up.

in hotjar, launch can be simple too in the basic scenario, but the product logic is broader. the more opportunities there are, the more decisions need to be made: what exactly to track, who will have access, what reports are needed, what filters to apply, what data to consider key.

what reports the site owner needs

many sites do not need full product analytics. they need a daily answer to simple questions: how many people came, which pages were opened, where the traffic came from, which countries and devices, whether they are online right now. webmetr specifically keeps these issues at the forefront.

for whom webmetr is better

webmetr is better suited for sites where the statistics should be clear not only to the analyst, but also to the owner, editor, partner or advertiser. if the site wants to show real traffic, a public counter and direct url reports make more practical sense than a closed internal dashboard.

webmetr is also a better fit if the seo logic of a visible counter is needed. counter can be placed on the site as a dofollow link on webmetr. it brings back the culture of old meters: the site not only collects statistics, but also publicly shows that it has an open metering system.

for whom hotjar is better

hotjar is better to choose when the task is not limited to "counting the site". if you need the special features of this particular class of product, webmetr shouldn't pretend to replace everything. it's better to honestly have two tools or choose the one that fits the actual task at hand.

if your team has a regular process of analytics, optimization, ux-research, product growth or behavior analysis, hotjar may be appropriate. if you just need to know the traffic of the site - webmetr is closer to the task.

seo-oriented comparison

if a person searches for "hotjar alternative for site", often they are not really looking for a copy of all the features. she is looking for an easier way. it may not need all modules, pricing tiers, event volume, recordings or enterprise settings. she needs clear site statistics.

that is why it is useful to position webmetr as a "simple site counter", "free site statistics", "old-school web analytics", "public site statistics", "visitor counter", "alternative to complex dashboard analytics". these are more precise queries than just an “analytics tool”.

why free hosted is important

free by itself is not always enough. if the product is free, but requires self-hosting, servers, updates, backup and maintenance, then it is free only under a license. time and responsibility still remain with the user.

webmetr is important precisely as a hosted free approach. the user does not need to raise the infrastructure. no need to configure the database. no need to think about scaling. he just uses the meter. for small and medium-sized sites, this is often more valuable than additional features that will never be exposed.

public statistics as an advantage

public statistics are no small matter. for media, catalogs, blogs, partner sites, advertising platforms and open projects, the ability to show real numbers has credibility. webmetr allows you to keep statistics private or make them public. this simple switch is important because the site owner decides what to show.

classic statistics pages are also convenient for indexing, referencing, and human memory. /stat/example.com/index.html is clearer than a complicated dashboard route with filters in state. web should be stateless where possible. site statistics must have an address.

can be used together

yes. webmetr does not prohibit the use of other tools. sometimes the best scheme is this: webmetr stands as a simple public counter and daily site statistics, and hotjar is used for its special task. then webmetr answers the traffic question, and the other product answers the question of its category.

but if you have to choose only one tool for a simple site, webmetr has a strong argument: it is simple, hosted, free and does not make the site owner think like an analytical team.

summary table

conclusion

webmetr is not trying to be the biggest analytics product on the market. webmetr tries to be the most understandable site meter. this is the difference. more features doesn't always mean a better choice. if the task is simple, the tool should be simple too.

compared to hotjar, webmetr wins where speed, free hosted launch, public statistics, static report addresses and clear web traffic metrics are needed. hotjar wins where its broader category of capabilities is needed. the correct solution depends on the task, but for normal website statistics, webmetr is much closer to the reality of the website owner.

sources